- GraalVM for JDK 23 (Latest)
- GraalVM for JDK 24 (Early Access)
- GraalVM for JDK 21
- GraalVM for JDK 17
- Archives
- Dev Build
- Truffle Language Implementation Framework
- Truffle Branches Instrumentation
- Dynamic Object Model
- Static Object Model
- Host Optimization for Interpreter Code
- Truffle Approach to Function Inlining
- Profiling Truffle Interpreters
- Truffle Interop 2.0
- Language Implementations
- Implementing a New Language with Truffle
- Truffle Native Function Interface
- Optimizing Truffle Interpreters
- Options
- On-Stack Replacement
- Truffle Strings Guide
- Specialization Histogram
- Testing DSL Specializations
- Polyglot API Based TCK
- Truffle Approach to the Compilation Queue
- Truffle Library Guide
- Truffle AOT Overview
- Truffle AOT Compilation
- Auxiliary Engine Caching
- Truffle Language Safepoint Tutorial
- Monomorphization
- Splitting Algorithm
- Monomorphization Use Cases
- Reporting Polymorphic Specializations to Runtime
Truffle Branches Instrumentation
In languages implemented on top of Truffle, it is common that the AST implementations contain fast and slow execution paths, usually based on some condition, such as a profile. These execution paths are organized into different conditional branches. In these cases, it is often helpful to know if running the program actually exercised the code in each of those executions paths.
The branch instrumentation functionality instruments if
-statements in target methods
to track which of the branches have been taken during execution. Branch instrumentation
does this by instrumenting branches with code that writes to a global
table. Each branch has an entry in this table. When the program ends, the
contents of the table are decoded and dumped to the standard output in readable
form.
There are several flags that control how branch instrumentation works. These flags are specified as system properties:
--engine.InstrumentBranches
- controls whether instrumentation is on (true
orfalse
, default isfalse
)--engine.InstrumentFilter
- filters methods in which instrumentation should be done (method filter syntax, essentially<package>.<class>.<method>[.<signature>]
)--engine.InstrumentationTableSize
- controls the maximum number of instrumented locations--engine.InstrumentBranchesPerInlineSite
- controls whether instrumentation provides separate branch profiles for each guest language function/compilation unit (default isfalse
).
Example Usage #
Here is an example of how to enable branch instrumentation on a program.
When using instrumentation to detect hot or infrequently used branches in a Truffle
language implementation, it usually starts by finding a language node with a
problematic method. The following command runs a unit test for the SimpleLanguage,
and instruments all the if
-statements:
mx --jdk jvmci sl --engine.BackgroundCompilation=false \
--engine.InstrumentBranches \
'--engine.InstrumentFilter=*.*.*' \
../truffle/truffle/com.oracle.truffle.sl.test/src/tests/LoopObjectDyn.sl
You get the following output:
Execution profile (sorted by hotness)
=====================================
0: *****************************************************
1: **************************
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLPropertyCacheNode.namesEqual(SLPropertyCacheNode.java:109) [bci: 120]
[0] state = IF(if=36054#, else=0#)
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLWhileRepeatingNode.executeRepeating(SLWhileRepeatingNode.java:102) [bci: 5]
[1] state = BOTH(if=18000#, else=18#)
This output tells that both branches were visited in the if
-statement in the file
SLWhileRepeatingNode.java
at line 102, and only the true
branch was visited for
the if
-statement in the file SLPropertyCacheNode.java
at line 109.
However, it does not tell, e.g., where this specific SLPropertyCacheNode
node was
used from – the same execute
method can be called from many different SimpleLanguage
nodes, and you may wish to distinguish these occurrences. Therefore, set the
per-inline-site flag to true
, and change the filter to focus only on
SLPropertyCacheNode
:
mx --jdk jvmci sl -Dgraal.TruffleBackgroundCompilation=false \
--engine.InstrumentBranchesPerInlineSite \
--engine.InstrumentBranches \
'--engine.InstrumentFilter=*.SLPropertyCacheNode.*' \
../truffle/truffle/com.oracle.truffle.sl.test/src/tests/LoopObjectDyn.sl
This time you get more output, because the method namesEqual
was inlined at
multiple sites (each site is represented by its inlining chain). The following output
fragment first shows the histogram with the if
-statement ID and its occurrence
count. It then shows the exact call stacks and execution counts for the branches.
For example, for [1]
, when namesEqual
is called from executeRead
, the true
branch is taken 18018
times. When the namesEqual
is called from executeWrite
([0]
), the true
branch is taken only 18
times:
Execution profile (sorted by hotness)
=====================================
1: ***************************************
2: ***************************************
0:
3:
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLPropertyCacheNode.namesEqual(SLPropertyCacheNode.java:109) [bci: 120]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLReadPropertyCacheNodeGen.executeRead(SLReadPropertyCacheNodeGen.java:76) [bci: 88]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLReadPropertyNode.read(SLReadPropertyNode.java:71) [bci: 7]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLReadPropertyNodeGen.executeGeneric(SLReadPropertyNodeGen.java:30) [bci: 35]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.SLExpressionNode.executeLong(SLExpressionNode.java:81) [bci: 2]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.expression.SLLessThanNodeGen.executeBoolean_long_long0(SLLessThanNodeGen.java:42) [bci: 5]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.expression.SLLessThanNodeGen.executeBoolean(SLLessThanNodeGen.java:33) [bci: 14]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLWhileRepeatingNode.evaluateCondition(SLWhileRepeatingNode.java:133) [bci: 5]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLWhileRepeatingNode.executeRepeating(SLWhileRepeatingNode.java:102) [bci: 2]
org.graalvm.compiler.truffle.OptimizedOSRLoopNode.executeLoop(OptimizedOSRLoopNode.java:113) [bci: 61]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLWhileNode.executeVoid(SLWhileNode.java:69) [bci: 5]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLBlockNode.executeVoid(SLBlockNode.java:84) [bci: 37]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLFunctionBodyNode.executeGeneric(SLFunctionBodyNode.java:81) [bci: 5]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.SLRootNode.execute(SLRootNode.java:78) [bci: 28]
[1] state = IF(if=18018#, else=0#)
...
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLPropertyCacheNode.namesEqual(SLPropertyCacheNode.java:109) [bci: 120]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLWritePropertyCacheNodeGen.executeWrite(SLWritePropertyCacheNodeGen.java:111) [bci: 244]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLWritePropertyNode.write(SLWritePropertyNode.java:73) [bci: 9]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLWritePropertyNodeGen.executeGeneric(SLWritePropertyNodeGen.java:33) [bci: 47]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.access.SLWritePropertyNodeGen.executeVoid(SLWritePropertyNodeGen.java:41) [bci: 2]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLBlockNode.executeVoid(SLBlockNode.java:84) [bci: 37]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.controlflow.SLFunctionBodyNode.executeGeneric(SLFunctionBodyNode.java:81) [bci: 5]
com.oracle.truffle.sl.nodes.SLRootNode.execute(SLRootNode.java:78) [bci: 28]
[0] state = IF(if=18#, else=0#)
...
Truffle Call Boundary Instrumentation #
The Truffle Call Boundary Instrumentation tool instruments callsites to methods that
have a TruffleCallBoundary
annotation, and counts the calls to those methods. It is
controlled by the following set of flags:
--engine.InstrumentBoundaries
- controls whether instrumentation is on (true
orfalse
, default isfalse
)--engine.InstrumentFilter
- filters methods in which instrumentation should be done (method filter syntax, essentially<package>.<class>.<method>[.<signature>]
)--engine.InstrumentationTableSize
- controls the maximum number of instrumented locations--engine.InstrumentBoundariesPerInlineSite
- controls whether instrumentation is done per a declaration of an Truffle boundary call (false
), or per every call stack where that callsite was inlined (true
)
This tool can be used together with the Branch Instrumentation tool.
Assume that you need to find frequently occurring methods that were not, for example,
inlined. The usual steps in identifying the Truffle call boundaries is to first run the
program with the InstrumentBoundariesPerInlineSite
flag set to false
, and
then, after identifying the problematic methods, set that flag to true
and set the
InstrumentFilter
to identify the particular call stacks for those methods.